|
Incursion Aversion
Incursion
Aversion
An advanced cockpit display system will one day help to reduce
aviation accident...before aircraft have even left the ground.
Developed by engineers at the NASA Langley Research Center, the
airport surveillance technology aims to prevent incidents and
near-misses on runways, taxiways and terminal ramps. Apparently
your 747 might be in as much danger from a catering truck as it
is from other jumbos.
Close calls on the tarmac between aircraft and ground vehicles
or other planes have grown steadily in the last decade, increasing
by about 60 percent over the last five years. Known as "runway
incursions", these events are defined by the Federal Aviation
Administration as "any occurrence at an airport that involves
an aircraft, vehicle, person or object on the ground that creates
a collision hazard or results in loss of separation with an aircraft
taking off, intending to take off, landing, or intending to land."
The term 'loss of separation' refers to air traffic control (ATC)
minimum distances between aircraft.
In extreme cases, runway incursions can be fatal. On a stormy
October night last year, a Singapore Airlines 747 hurtled down
a runway blocked by construction equipment. Eighty three people
lost their lives. In March 1977, a KLM aircraft started an unauthorised
take-off roll down the runway at Tenerife. A Pan Am 747 was still
taxiing there and the resulting collision killed 583 passengers
and crew; the worst ever accident in aviation history.
In its attempt to reduce aircraft fatalities by 80 percent over
the next decades, incursion avoidance has been named the FAA's
number one safety priority. NASA’s Runway Incursion Prevention
System or RIPS is part of the approach. It would give pilots and
air traffic controllers an early warning if other planes or even
ground vehicles are about to intrude onto the runway. That will
mean safer ground movements and, unusually for a security strategy,
even faster and more efficient operations.
Big Brother
The RIPS integrates several advanced technologies into a
surface communication, navigation and surveillance system for
flight crews and air traffic controllers. It combines a dashboard
mounted moving map of the airport's runways and taxiways with
a head-up screen that gives the pilot real-time guidance. The
system shows and sounds an alert if another plane or vehicle is
about to encroach onto the runway.
Air and ground vehicles can be pinpointed is several ways. Radar
is the most likely method. Equipment installed on high points
can be tuned to track surface traffic. As a back-up, aircraft
and automobiles could be fitted with radio tags interfaced with
GPS data or receivers embedded in the tarmac. For ground controllers
and pilots with a restricted field of view, blind spots could
thus be virtually eliminated.
RIPS is just one component of an advanced flight deck display
system that would provide flight crews with vital airborne and
ground data, including terrain, ground obstacles, air traffic,
landing and approach patterns and detailed airport surface maps.
Another potential tool is NASA’s Synthetic Vision System, which
processes GPS signals, three-dimensional terrain databases and
sensors of various types to give pilots unparalleled cockpit information.
Synthetic Vision would offer flight crews a clear electronic picture
of what’s outside, no matter what the weather or time of day.
For example, infrared cameras may be used at night or in bad weather.
Theoretically, this may lead to windowless cockpits, with the
pilots relying solely on their electronic eyes.
Testing, testing…
The RIPS technologies were demonstrated at busy Dallas/Fort Worth
International Airport late last year. Technicians equipped a NASA
757 aircraft with the experimental displays and computer systems.
Both NASA and commercial pilots took the 757 for a number of overnight
flight tests to evaluate the gear. Their observations will be
used to help refine the displays for possible use in airliners.
Harry Verstynen, the chief pilot from Langley, says the RIPS
display has multiple uses. "Even for the large percentage of the
time that you are not having a runway incursion the displays will
give the pilot significant improvements in situational awareness
on the airport and taxiing in low visibility conditions."
Airline pilots have also given the concept high marks. "We have
made several recommendations on some changes, but overall it's
a well-thought-out system," said John Penney of United Airlines.
"With a few minor adjustments, I think it’s something commercial
industry and aviation industry should take and grab hold of."
Second
on the left
The best thing about the RIPS idea is that it will not only save
lives, but also get we members of the flying public to our destinations
more quickly. As things stand, much potential travel time is wasted
by waiting for aircraft to move through the required separation
buffers, especially during periods of darkness or inclement weather.
If aircrew and ATC personnel are given a more definitive picture
of where every element of the equation is, aircraft movements
could be packed closer together. Tests have also shown that pilots
are confident enough to taxi at higher speeds if provided with
the enhanced readouts.
To be fair, NASA is not the only party working on ground collision
avoidance. Portland-based Flight Dynamics has developed its own
technologies, called the Surface Guidance System (SGS). This package
uses a head-up display to paint relevant ground movement information
onto the cockpit windscreen. This can include arrows showing a
pre-approved route to the terminal, speed limits and even virtual
traffic cones to let the pilot know if he is approaching a section
of the tarmac where he should not be. Warning signals will sound
and flash if the aircraft crosses its approved zone or otherwise
deviates from its assigned taxi path.
If only the same could be done for those wobbly-wheeled baggage
trolleys.
|